| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office
top_img
Clin Mol Hepatol > Volume 23(1); 2017 > Article
Cho, Kim, Song, Lee, Kim, Lee, Kang, Kim, Lee, and Chae: Efficacy and safety of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for Korean patients with HCV genotype Ib infection: a retrospective multi-institutional study

Abstract

Background/Aims

The combination of daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) has demonstrated a high sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) and a low rate of adverse events in previous clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to clarify the results of treatment and side effects in Korean patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype Ib infection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from chronic HCV genotype Ib patients treated with DCV+ASV from August 2015 to September 2016 at five hospitals in the Daejeon-Chungcheong area.

Results

A total of 152 patients were examined for resistance associated variants (RAVs). Among them, 15 (9.9%) were positive for Y93 and one (0.7%) was positive for L31. Of 126 patients treated with DCV+ASV, 83 patients completed treatment and 76 patients were included in safety and efficacy analysis. Five (6.6%) were positive for Y93 and 12 (15.8%) exhibited cirrhotic change. DCV+ASV was the first-line treatment for 58 (76.3%) patients. Eleven (14.5%) patients relapsed after previous treatment that included interferon and seven (9.2%) of these patients were found to be intolerant of interferon. Adverse events occurred in 10 (13.2%) patients and two patients stopped the medication because of severe itching and skin rash. SVR12 was 89.5% (68/76) in all patients and 91.5% (65/71) in RAV-negative patients.

Conclusions

DCV+ASV showed good efficacy in patients with HCV Ib infection in Korea. Close monitoring is needed for severe adverse events and treatment failure, which were uncommon.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was once best treated using peginterferon plus ribavirin. The difficulties with this treatment included severe adverse events, inconvenience of injection, and the long treatment duration required. The cure rate was only 60-70%, although it has improved [1].
This treatment was supplanted by use of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) in the mid-1990s. The cure rate increased to over 90%, the treatment duration was shortened, and treatment became more convenient since an injection was not required. Peginterferon is no longer recommended as the first-line treatment [2-4].
The combination of daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) was developed in Japan for the treatment of HCV genotype Ib. A few clinical studies including some Korean patients reported the high sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) rate and a low rate of adverse events. The DCV+ASV combination was the first DAA approved for use in Korea in August 2015 with some usage limitations. This study aimed to clarify the results of treatment and side effects in Korean patients with chronic HCV genotype Ib infection treated with DCV+ASV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We included the patients who was infected with HCV genotype Ib and took examination for resistance associated variants (RAV) at 5 university hospitals located on Daejeon-Chungcheong area. The patients with decompensated cirrhosis were excluded by calculating Child-Pugh score with abdominal sonography, computed tomography, and blood test. The enrolled patients were divided into the treatment naïve group, treatment failure group (including null response, partial response, virologic breakthrough, relapse to previous treatment), and intolerant group (discontinued peginterferon because of side effects). The definition of virologic response followed the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) guideline [3]. Positive RAV rate was determined in all enrolled patients. Rates of end of treatment response (ETR), SVR12, adverse events were analyzed in patients who completed the treatment. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee at each site. Patients were not required to give informed consent because this study used clinical data obtained after patients had agreed to treatment before initiation of treatment.

RAV examination

RAV examination focused on variants of non-structural 5A (NS5A). All five sites submitted samples for testing at Seoul Medical Science Institute. NS5A was detected by direct sequencing using a Veriti 96 well thermal cycler and genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The limit of detection of HCV RNA was 5,000 IU/mL. The result was recorded as positive or negative according to presence of RAV sites L31 or Y93. If result was “not detected”, reexamination of HCV genotype was done to exclude the other genotype.

Clinical and laboratory assessments

Hemotological and biochemical tests were performed before and during treatment at as close as possible to 4, 8, 16, 24 weeks during and 12 weeks after treatment. Cirrhosis of the liver was diagnosed by abdominal sonography and computed tomography. The Child-Pugh score was calculated to determine the difference in treatment results. Adverse events were identified by review of medical records and were confirmed concerning onset time, severity, and duration by discussion with co-authors at each site.

Measurement of HCV RNA and assessment of treatment efficacy

HCV RNA was measured by a real-time PCR assay at each site. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of HCV RNA was 15 IU/mL at four sites and 40 IU/mL at the other site. Virologic breakthrough was defined as an increase of HCV RNA >1 log10 from nadir or HCV RNA ≥LLOQ after a measurements below LLOQ. ETR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at the end of 24 weeks of treatment and SVR12 was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks after treatment.

Statistical analyses

Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Chi-square test or Student’s t-test were for univariate analyses. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Prevalence of RAV

Total 152 patients comprised of 62 (40.8%) men and 90 (59.2%) women took RAV examination. Their mean age was 55.8±11.7 years old. Fifteen (9.9%) patients and one (0.7%) patient showed positive RAV at Y93 and L31, respectively. No patient showed positive RAV at both regions. Six (9.7%) men and 10 (11.1%) women showed positive RAV with no significant difference. The prevalence of RAV was 10.6% (Table 1).

Baseline characteristics of the treated patients

Of 126 patients treated with DCV+ASV, 83 patients finished the treatment. Seven patients were excluded due to follow-up loss (n=5), HCC recurrence (n=1) and expire because of accident (n=1). Finally, 76 patients including 32 (42.1%) men and 44 (57.9%) women were analyzed for safety and efficacy (Fig. 1). Mean age was 54.7±10.9 years. Five (6.6%) patients who showed positive RAV (Y93) were included. Compensated cirrhosis was present at baseline in 14 (18.4%) patients and absent in 62 (81.6%) patients. There were 58 (76.3%) treatment-naïve patients, 11 (14.5%) treatment failure patient s, and 7 (9.2%) patient s who did not tolerate peginterferon+ribavirin treatment (Table 2).

Adverse event

Adverse treatment-related events were reported in 10 (13.2%) patients. Transient aminotransferase increase <3-fold was noted in two (2.6%) patients. Four (5.2%) patients complained of gastrointestinal discomfort including anorexia (n=1), abdominal pain (n=1), and indigestion (n=2) without discontinuing treatment. Four (5.2%) patients suffered from skin rash and itching. Among them, two patients stopped the drugs due to severe itching. One of the two patients was a 59 year old female who relapsed after peginterferon+ribavirin treatment. She stopped treatment after 8 days. The second patient was an 80 year old female who had no previous treatment history. She first stopped the drugs at 20 days after treatment and restarted again after several days. But she finally stopped after 4 months because of recurrence of severe itching and rash. HCV RNA was not detected at 12 weeks after treatment (Table 3).

Virologic response

Seventy-six patients were analyzed for virologic response. SVR12 was 89.5% (68/76) overall, 89.7% (52/58) in the treatment-naïve group, 81.8% (9/11) in the treatment-failure group, and 100% (7/7) in the treatment-intolerant group. SVR12 for negative RAV patients was 91.5% (65/71) overall, 90.9% (50/55) in the treatment-naïve group, 88.9% (8/9) in the treatment-failure group, and 100% (7/7) in the treatment-intolerant group (Fig. 2).
Sixty nine (90.8%) patients achieved ETR. The one patient displayed detectable RNA at 24 weeks after treatment. Y93 was positive on pretreatment examination of the patient. One patient who achieved ETR showed detectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks after cessation of treatment. The patient was relapsed after 48 weeks treatment of peginterferon+ribavirin and showed positive Y93.
SVR12 was analyzed according to baseline factors of age, sex, presence of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, and HCV RNA level. There was higher SVR12 tendency in patients younger than 60 years, in male, without cirrhosis, and HCV RNA level ≥6 log10 IU/mL without statistical significance (Fig. 3).

DISCUSSION

DCV is a NS5A inhibitor that displays antiviral activity to all HCV genotypes in vitro [5]. ASV is a NS3 protease inhibitor that has antiviral activity to HCV genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6 in vitro [6]. The authors of the study conducted in Japan reported that DCV+ASV produced high and low SVR to HCV genotype Ib and Ia, respectively. Use of DCV+ASV only for HCV genotype Ib in Japan was recommended and implemented. Insurance coverage of these drugs in Korea in effect since August 2015 limited against genotype Ib [7].
This genotype is the most prevalent subtype in Korea, accounting for a reported 45.4% of cases of HCV [8]. DCV+ASV have been widely prescribed for treatment of chronic HCV infection in Korea, given the aforementioned findings and insurance coverage. The higher SVR of DCV+ASV compared with peginterferon+ribavirin is an advantage. Use of DCV+ASV produced SVR12 in 83.7% of treated Asian patients in a clinical study [9]. Subgroup analysis in the same study revealed SVR12 rates of was 92.3% in the treatment-naïve group, 80% in the prior non-responders group, and 78.6% in the ineligible/intolerant group. Previous treatment history was a predictive factor for SVR12 in this prior and the present studies. Presently, the SVR12 rate of 89.7% in the treatment-naïve group was higher than the rate in the treatment failure group (81.8%), similar to a prior clinical study [10].
The presence of RAV was most important predictive factor of SVR in DCV+ASV treatment. Cases featuring positive RAV in a pretreatment examination are not eligible for insurance coverage in Korea. The prevalence of RAV is differs according to race and country; Japan has highest prevalence of RAV and non-Asian countries have lower prevalence of RAV than Asian countries [11-13]. The HALLMARK DUAL study, which included 78 Korean patients and 85 Taiwanese patients, reported an 11.8% (18/153) prevalence of RAV [9]. Among the 18 patients, 15 were Y93 positive and the remaining three were L31 positive. In the present study, 152 patients were examined for RAV; the resulting prevalence of 10.6% was similar with the prior study.
Presently, SVR12 in cases of positive RAV was markedly decreased. Similarly, a previous clinical study noted decreases from 95.9% to 58.8% in treatment-naïve patients, from 91.5% to 28% in previous non-responders, and from 90.1% to 36.7% in ineligible/intolerant patients [14]. This study also revealed similar results, although there were fewer RAV positive patients. RAV examinations in Korea are done at the Seoul Medical Science Institute using direct sequencing. If minor sequences of RAV are detected in more than 10% of the major sequence, the assigned result is RAV positive [15]. If the RAV including L31 and Y93 is lower than 10%, the result is negative. Whether a prevalence of RAV <10% influences SVR is still unclear.
Another factor affecting SVR12 is pretreatment HCV RNA level. The HALLMARK DUAL study reported an odds ratio of SVR12 of 3.38 for HCV RNA <800,000 IU/mL. SVR12 was higher with lower HCV RNA in treatment-naïve (96% vs. 87%) patients, previous non-responders (93% vs. 80%), and in ineligible/intolerant (88% vs. 80%) patients [14]. However, presently patients with HCV RNA ≥6 log10 IU/mL displayed higher SVR12 rate (90.5% vs. 88.2%). The present results should be interpreted cautiously, given the low numbers of patients in the groups.
DAA therapy including DCV+ASV is convenient and less often has adverse events compared to treatment involving peginterferon. The latter treatment can be stopped due to adverse events including myalgia, anemia, neutropenia, and depression, and has a reportedly low cure rate, especially in patients with cirrhosis [16,17]. In contrast, DCV+ASV produce mild adverse events in most clinical studies including patients with cirrhosis. Furthermore, SVR12 has been shown to be unaffected by presence of cirrhosis [14,18,19]. Presently, the SVR12 rate was lower in patients with cirrhosis. The dichotomy between prior and the present studies need clarification with more patients.
The most common adverse event of DCV+ASV is liver enzyme elevation; its prevalence is about 2% [14]. In this study, the prevalence of liver enzyme elevation was 2.6%. The American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and KASL guidelines recommend that drug treatment should be stopped when enzyme elevation is ≥10 times [2,3]. There was no discontinued case in our study. Skin problems can developed in all DAA treatment regimens, with a prevalence of up to 9.8% in combination with ribavirin and 3.8% without ribavirin [20]. Presently, four patients complained of skin problems and two stopped DCV+ASV treatment. It is very rare to stop DAA treatment due to skin problems. The patient who stopped the drug due to severe skin rash and itching achieved SVR12 even though medication was taken for only 4 months. This is similar with the patients who stopped the drug due to markedly elevated liver enzyme in previous clinical studies. This means there is a possibility to achieve SVR12 as long as medication is taken, even if the 24-week treatment regimen is not completed.
Up to 150 million individuals worldwide suffer from chronic HCV infection, with a prevalence of approximately 1% in Korea [8,21]. Therefore, the development of DAA is good news to patients with chronic hepatitis C. We confirmed that DCV+ASV in Korean patients has similar treatment efficacy and adverse events reported in prior clinical studies. But close monitoring to virologic breakthrough and severe adverse events are still needed.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Figure 1.
Flow chart summarizing patient selection. HCV, hepatitis C virus; NS5A, non-structural 5A; RAV, resistance-associated variant; DCV, daclatasvir; ASV, asunaprevir.

cmh-2016-0053f1.tif
Figure 2.
SVR12 overall and by prior treatment status in patients treated with DCV+ASV analyzed according to the presence of RAV. SVR12 was higher in RAV(-) patients than in RAV(+) patients. DCV, daclatasvir; ASV, asunaprevir; RAV, resistance-associated variant; SVR12, sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment.

cmh-2016-0053f2.tif
Figure 3.
SVR12 according to baseline age, sex, presence of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, and pretreatment HCV RNA level. There was a higher SVR12 tendency in those who were male, younger than 60 years, without cirrhosis, and with an HCV RNA level ≥6 log10 IU/mL, but these findings were not statistically significant. HCV, hepatitis C virus; SVR12, sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment.

cmh-2016-0053f3.tif
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the patients who underwent RAV examination
Variable Value
Total 152
 Male 62 (40.8)
 Female 90 (59.2)
 Age 55.8±11.7
RAV
 L31 1 (0.7)
 Y93 15 (9.9)
 Male 6/62 (9.7)
 Female 10/90 (11.1)
 Total 16 (10.6)

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

SD, standard deviation; RAV, resistance associated variants.

Table 2.
Baseline characteristics of patients treated with DCV+ASV
Variable Value
Total 76
 Male 32 (42.1)
 Female 44 (57.9)
 Age 54.7±10.9
RAV
 L31 0 (0)
 Y93 5 (6.6)
LC 14 (18.4)
Naive 58 (76.3)
Treatment failure 11 (14.5)
Intolerant to PEG-IFN 7 (9.2)
Mean HCV RNA value (log10 IU/mL) 6.5±6.6
Mean ALT level (IU/mL) 55.9±58.6

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

SD, standard deviation; RAV, resistance associated variants; LC, liver cirrhosis; PEG-IFN, peginterferon; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

Table 3.
Summary of adverse events in patients treated with DCV+ASV (76 patients)
Event Value
Liver enzyme elevation 2 (2.6)
GI problem 4 (5.2)
 Anorexia 1
 Abdominal pain 1
 Indigestion 2
Skin problem 4 (5.2)
 Skin rash 3
 Itching 2
Generalized weakness 2 (2.6)
Total 10 (13.2)

Values are presented as n (%). Two patients complained of two kinds of symptoms.

GI, gastrointestinal.

Abbreviations

ASV
asunaprevir
DAAs
direct acting antivirals
DCV
daclatasvir
ETR
end of treatment response
HCV
hepatitis C virus
LLOQ
lower limit of quantification
NS5A
non-structural 5A
RAV
resistance associated variant
SVR12
sustained virologic response at 12 weeks

REFERENCES

1. Webster DP, Klenerman P, Dusheiko GM. Hepatitis C. Lancet 2015;385:1124-1135.
crossref pmid pmc
2. AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C guidance: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 2015;62:932-954.
pmid
3. Korean Association for the Study of the Liver. KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C. Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22:76-139.
pmid pmc
4. European Association for Study of Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2015. J Hepatol 2015;63:199-236.
pmid
5. Gao M. Antiviral activity and resistance of HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitors. Curr Opin Virol 2013;3:514-520.
crossref pmid
6. McPhee F, Sheaffer AK, Friborg J, Hernandez D, Falk P, Zhai G, et al. Preclinical profile and characterization of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitor asunaprevir (BMS-650032). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:5387-5396.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Lok AS, Gardiner DF, Lawitz E, Martorell C, Everson GT, Ghalib R, et al. Preliminary study of two antiviral agents for hepatitis C genotype 1. N Engl J Med 2012;366:216-224.
crossref pmid
8. Seong MH, Kil H, Kim YS, Bae SH, Lee YJ, Lee HC, et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of hepatitis C virus infection in South Korea: a prospective, multicenter cohort study. J Med Virol 2013;85:1724-1733.
crossref pmid
9. Kao JH, Lee YJ, Heo J, Ahn SH, Lim YS, Peng CY, et al. All-oral daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection: a sub-analysis in Asian patients from the HALLMARK DUAL study. Liver Int 2016;36:1433-1441.
crossref pmid
10. Kumada H, Suzuki Y, Ikeda K, Toyota J, Karino Y, Chayama K, et al. Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for chronic HCV genotype 1b infection. Hepatology 2014;59:2083-2091.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Bartels DJ, Sullivan JC, Zhang EZ, Tigges AM, Dorrian JL, De Meyer S, et al. Hepatitis C virus variants with decreased sensitivity to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) were rarely observed in DAA-naive patients prior to treatment. J Virol 2013;87:1544-1553.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Karino Y, Toyota J, Ikeda K, Suzuki F, Chayama K, Kawakami Y, et al. Characterization of virologic escape in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b patients treated with the direct-acting antivirals daclatasvir and asunaprevir. J Hepatol 2013;58:646-654.
crossref pmid
13. Miura M, Maekawa S, Sato M, Komatsu N, Tatsumi A, Takano S, et al. Deep sequencing analysis of variants resistant to the non-structural 5A inhibitor daclatasvir in patients with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatol Res 2014;44:E360-E367.
crossref pmid
14. Manns M, Pol S, Jacobson IM, Marcellin P, Gordon SC, Peng CY; HALLMARK-DUAL Study Team. All-oral daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1b: a multinational, phase 3, multicohort study. Lancet 2014;384:1597-1605.
crossref pmid
15. Itakura J, Kurosaki M, Takada H, Nakakuki N, Matsuda S, Gondou K, et al. Naturally occurring, resistance-associated hepatitis C virus NS5A variants are linked to interleukin-28B genotype and are sensitive to interferon-based therapy. Hepatol Res 2015;45:E115-E121.
crossref pmid
16. Bruno S, Shiffman ML, Roberts SK, Gane EJ, Messinger D, Hadziyannis SJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Hepatology 2010;51:388-397.
crossref pmid
17. Bourlière M, Khaloun A, Wartelle-Bladou C, Oules V, Portal I, Benali S, et al. Future treatment of patients with HCV cirrhosis. Liver Int 2012;32(Suppl 1):113-119.
crossref pmid
18. Muir AJ, Poordad F, Lalezari J, Everson G, Dore GJ, Herring R, et al. Daclatasvir in combination with asunaprevir and beclabuvir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection with compensated cirrhosis. JAMA 2015;313:1736-1744.
crossref pmid
19. Nam HC, Lee HL, Yang H, Song MJ. Efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection. Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22:259-266.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Patel P, Malik K, Krishnamurthy K. Cutaneous adverse events in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with new direct-acting antivirals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cutan Med Surg 2016;20:58-66.
crossref pmid
21. World Health Organization (WHO). Fact sheet N°164: hepatitis C. WHO web site, <http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164_apr2014/en/>. Accessed 2014.07.03.

Editorial Office
The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
Room A1210, 53 Mapo-daero(MapoTrapalace, Dowha-dong), Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04158, Korea
TEL: +82-2-703-0051   FAX: +82-2-703-0071    E-mail: kasl@kams.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver. All rights reserved.