Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/e-cmh/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-11.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 92 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 93 Editorial on “Direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CMH : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Editorial

Editorial on “Direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”


Published online: February 24, 2025

1Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

2Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

3Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore

5Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

Corresponding author : Yu Jun Wong Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore 529889 Tel: +65-69365729, E-mail: eugene.wong.y.j@singhealth.com.sg

Editor: Han Ah Lee, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Korea

• Received: February 14, 2025   • Accepted: February 21, 2025

Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 3,399 Views
  • 41 Download
  • 1 Crossref
The introduction of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, offering exceptional efficacy and tolerability, even in patients with decompensated cirrhosis [1-6]. While the benefit of DAA treatment in HCV patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have received curative treatments are well established [7,8], its role in patients with active HCV-related HCC, particularly those with intermediate stage HCC, has been a subject of ongoing discussion. Traditionally, the impact on intermediate-stage HCC has been debated due to the inherent challenges in deciphering the confounding effect of HCC itself from the overall survival. Concerns also existed regarding the extended timeframe needed to observe the sustainable clinical improvements from fibrosis regression and portal pressure reduction.
Firstly, the survival benefit of DAA among patients with intermediate stage HCC was largely unknown due to the confounding effect of HCC on patients’ survival. Secondly, longer duration beyond SVR12 is needed to observed the clinical improvement in fibrosis regression, portal pressure reduction and clinical recompensation [9,10]. Concerns also existed regarding the lower sustained virological response (SVR12) observed in patients with HCC [2,11].
In the current issue, Lee et al.’s study provides compelling evidence supporting the use of DAA among patients with HCV-related HCC [12]. This large-scale analysis of the Taiwan nationwide HCV registry included 23,774 HCV patients (2,205 HCC, 21,569 no HCC) treated with DAA between 2013 to 2020, found a lower SVR12 rate in patients with HCC (96.6% vs. 98.8%, P<0.001). Of note, majority of the HCC patients in this cohort have good adherence (>80%) to DAA, and about 800 (36.3%) had non-cirrhotic HCV-related HCC. Moreover, achieving SVR12 (vs. no SVR12) was associated with better survival in HCC patients (aHR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28–0.59; P<0.001). This benefit persists even after accounting for cirrhosis, BCLC stage, gender, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Collectively, both the high SVR12 rates and survival benefit supports the use of DAA in patients with intermediate-stage HCC, which is potentially practice changing.
This study is commendable as it addresses previous gaps regarding DAA use in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. While SVR status did not significantly influence the 1-year survival in patients with HCC (SVR 95.2% vs. no-SVR 93.1%), the survival benefit of SVR became more pronounced over time, with the gap widening at 2-year and 3-year post treatment (2 years 87.2% vs. 70.6%; 3 years 79.2% vs. 48.3%). The observation on the diverging survival curves of SVR12 after one year may guide patient selection for DAA in the HCC patients with limited prognosis.
The improvement in overall survival should be interpreted in the context of other confounding factors. Firstly, the HCC treatment options had rapidly expanded over the study period. A stratified analysis comparing SVR12-related survival benefits between different of HCC treatments modalities (ablation, locoregional therapy, systemic chemotherapy, or immunotherapy) would provide more nuanced insights. The potential synergistic effects of SVR-induced liver function improvement on systemic therapy outcomes warrant further investigation. This is particularly relevant for the 9% of patients with BCLC stage C HCC who may benefit from newer systemic therapies.
Secondly, distinguishing between HCC-related outcomes in patients with and without SVR12 is crucial, especially given the conflicting data on the risk of HCC recurrence after DAA treatment [8]. To understand the biological plausibility of survival benefits of SVR, liver-related death (acute chronic liver failure, hepatorenal syndrome or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) should be analysed separately from HCC-related death (recurrence of advanced staged HCC). One may postulate the survival benefit of SVR being largely driven by the decrease in liver-related death through recompensation and decrease in portal pressure.
Thirdly, the absence of a control group comprising untreated HCV-related HCC patients raise the concern of potential selection bias, since patients receiving DAA therapy might have inherently better liver function or access to specialised care. The validity of the survival benefit from attaining SVR12 could be strengthen with inclusion of a well-matched cohort of untreated HCC patients.
Lastly, the severity of underlying cirrhosis affects both prognosis and likelihood of achieving SVR in patients with HCV-related HCC. A stratified analysis by Child-Turcotte- Pugh class or MELD score would help differentiate whether the survival benefit is primarily driven by SVR or by better baseline liver function [13].
The current study significantly contributes to the growing body of evidences supporting the safety and tolerability of DAA in patients with HCV-related HCC, even in intermediate or advanced-stage -stage disease. With expanding armamentarium of HCC treatment, DAA-attained SVR12 may improve liver function, offering hope for patients with intermediate and advanced-stage HCC [14].

Authors’ contribution

Study conception: Yu Jun Wong. Manuscript draft: Yan Ling Ong. Critical review of the manuscript and final review: Daniel Huang, Apichat Kaewdech, Yu Jun Wong.

Acknowledgements

Dr. WYJ is supported by the Nurturing Clinician Scientist Scheme (NCCS) award from the SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors of no relevant conflict of interest to declare.

DAA

direct-acting antiviral

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV

hepatitis C virus
  • 1. Wong YJ, Thurairajah PH, Kumar R, Fock KM, Law NM, Chong SY, et al. The impact of unrestricted access to direct-acting antiviral among incarcerated hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Clin Mol Hepatol 2021;27:474-485.
  • 2. Wong YJ, Thurairajah PH, Kumar R, Tan J, Fock KM, Law NM, et al. Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in a real-world chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;36:1300-1308.
  • 3. Loo JH, Xu WXF, Low JT, Tay WX, Ang LS, Tam YC, et al. Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with or without ribavirin in hepatitis C genotype 3 compensated cirrhosis: A meta-analysis. World J Hepatol 2022;14:1248-1257.
  • 4. Ji F, Tran S, Ogawa E, Huang CF, Suzuki T, Wong YJ, et al. Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral for 15,849 patients with chronic hepatitis C: A multinational cohort study. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2024;12:646-658.
  • 5. Tay WX, Koh SJ, Teh FKB, Tan YB, Qiu TY, Mai LW, et al. Minimal monitoring is a safe but underutilised strategy for hepatitis C virus management in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap 2023;52:321-323.
  • 6. Wong YJ, Tran S, Huang CF, Hsu YC, Preda C, Toyoda H, et al. Real-world treatment outcome with protease inhibitor direct-acting antiviral in advanced hepatitis C cirrhosis: a REAL-C study. Hepatol Int 2023;17:1150-1161.
  • 7. Huang DQ, Hoang JK, Kamal R, Tsai PC, Toyoda H, Yeh ML, et al. Antiviral therapy utilization and 10-year outcomes in resected hepatitis B virus- and hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2024;42:790-799.
  • 8. Singal AG, Rich NE, Mehta N, Branch A, Pillai A, Hoteit M, et al. Direct-acting antiviral therapy not associated with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in a multicenter North American cohort study. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1683-1692.e1.
  • 9. Lens S, Baiges A, Alvarado-Tapias E, LLop E, Martinez J, Fortea JI, et al. Clinical outcome and hemodynamic changes following HCV eradication with oral antiviral therapy in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2020;73:1415-1424.
  • 10. Wong YJ, Zhaojin C, Tosetti G, Degasperi E, Sharma S, Agarwal S, et al. Baveno-VII criteria to predict decompensation and initiate non-selective beta-blocker in compensated advanced chronic liver disease patients. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29:135-145.
  • 11. Devan P, Tiong KLA, Neo JE, Mohan BP, Wijarnpreecha K, Tam YCS, et al. Treatment outcomes of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir in direct-acting antiviral-experienced hepatitis C virus patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Viruses 2023;15:1489.
  • 12. Lee SW, Yang SS, Tsai PC, Huang CF, Chen CY, Hung CH, et al. Direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study. Clin Mol Hepatol 2025;31:899-913.
  • 13. Wong YJ, Buckholz A, Sim A, Teng M, Wong R, Curry MP, et al. Nonalcohol-related cirrhosis leads to higher 6-week mortality after acute variceal bleeding than alcohol-related cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024 Dec 14;doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.022.
  • 14. Kaewdech A, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Piratvisuth T. Asian perspective on hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus elimination. Viruses 2024;17:34.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Editorial on “Direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Editorial on “Direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”
Close
Editorial on “Direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”
Editorial on “Direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”