Correspondence on Editorial regarding “Baveno-VII criteria to predict decompensation and initiate non-selective beta-blocker in compensated advanced chronic liver disease patients”

Article information

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(1):188-190
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 November 22
doi : https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2022.0408
1Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
2Duke-NUS Academic Clinical Program, SingHealth, Singapore
3Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Dehli, India
4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
5CHESS Center, Institute of Portal Hypertension, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
Corresponding author : Yu Jun Wong Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, 2, Simei Street 3, 529889, Singapore Tel: +65-69365729, E-mail: eugene.wong.y.j@singhealth.com.sg
Editor: Seung Up Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea
Received 2022 November 16; Revised 2022 November 17; Accepted 2022 November 18.

Dear Editor,

We would like to thank Dr. Semmler and colleagues [1] for their interest in our study [2]. In the present study, we sought to demonstrate the applicability of non-invasive tests (NIT)-based criteria in risk-stratifying compensated cirrhosis patients in the real-world clinical practice.

We included patients with cirrhosis driven by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, whom etiological cure is not currently available - these patients represent compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) without removal of primary etiology. We also included viral-related cirrhosis with adequate virological suppression, which is the current standard of care [3,4]. The inclusion of treated viral-related cirrhosis should not invalidate our conclusion, because even after virological suppression, cirrhosis patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) may still have CSPH, meaning these patients remain at risk of future decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma [2,5].

The number needed-to-treat was probably higher by including patients with treated viral-related cirrhosis in this study. However, given the robust scientific evidence of removing primary etiology can improve outcomes in viral-related cirrhosis, there should be little debate on whether these patients should be treated [6]. What remains uncertain, is whether non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) are needed to prevent decompensation in all cACLD patients with virological suppression and persistence CSPH, when CSPH was assessed using NIT-based criteria [7]. Indeed, there was a risk of first hepatic decompensation in almost half of our patients (predominantly cured hepatitis C virus [HCV] infection and CSPH-ruled in by NIT) vs. the placebo group of the PREDESCI (β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension) trial, which mostly included untreated HCV patients with CSPH (13.3% vs. 24.0%). This difference likely reflects the impact of virological suppression in HCV patients in our cohort. In a way, it is reassuring to see that NIT-based assessment of CSPH remained predictive of liver decompensation in viral-related cirrhosis patients achieving viral suppression. Since cirrhosis patients may continue to have CSPH (thus, the risk of liver decompensation), NSBB should be considered to prevent decompensation in these patients.

As described in our study, patients with NSBB at baseline (presumably at higher baseline risk of CSPH, high-risk varices and liver decompensation) were excluded since NSBB may reduce the risk of liver decompensation [8], as shown in PREDESCI trial [9]. Nevertheless, this subgroup was small, and subgroup analysis showed that CSPH (liver stiffness measurement ≥25 kPa) remained predictive of decompensation after excluding patients with high-risk varices.

There were a significant proportion of patients falling within the grey zone, which was also demonstrated in a recent study by Semmler et al. [10]. This is consistent with the performance of transient elastography to exclude or include patients with advanced fibrosis. Unfortunately, we did not have the data on spleen stiffness and the ratio of von Willebrand factor and platelet count (VITRO) in the current cohort. Finally, as stated in our manuscript, we performed competing risk regression by cluster to account for heterogeneity and regional differences across the four cohorts of patients.

In summary, our findings demonstrated that Baveno-VII criteria of CSPH can predict liver decompensation and liverrelated events in compensated cirrhosis/cACLD patients. We agree that a pragmatic “non-invasive” PREDESCI trial would be desirable to re-ensure our current clinical practice using contemporary patients, particularly cACLD patients after HCV cure, as it would also help confirm our findings. Until then, our findings suggest that NSBB should be considered in cirrhosis patients with CSPH diagnosed using non-invasive criteria.

Notes

Authors’ contribution

Drafting of manuscript: YJW; Critical review of manuscript: All authors

Conflicts of Interest

YJW is an invited speaker for Gilead Science and AbbVie. The other authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Acknowledgements

YJW was supported by research grant from Medicine Academic Medical Center, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Abbreviations

cACLD

compensated advanced chronic liver disease

CSPH

clinically significant portal hypertension

HCV

hepatitis C virus

NASH

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NIT

non-invasive tests

NSBB

non-selective beta blocker

VITRO

the ratio of von Willebrand factor and platelet count

References

1. Semmler G, Jachs M, Mandorfer M. Non-invasive tests-based risk stratification: Baveno VII and beyond. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29:105–109.
2. Wong YJ, Zhaojin C, Tosetti G, Degasperi E, Sharma S, Agarwal S, et al. Baveno-VII criteria to predict decompensation and initiate non-selective beta-blocker in compensated advanced chronic liver disease patients. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29:135–145.
3. Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2018;12:33–34.
4. Lens S, Baiges A, Alvarado-Tapias E, LLop E, Martinez J, Fortea JI, et al. Clinical outcome and hemodynamic changes following HCV eradication with oral antiviral therapy in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2020;73:1415–1424.
5. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: final update of the series. J Hepatol 2020;73:1170–1218.
6. Tosetti G, Degasperi E, Farina E, D’Ambrosio R, Soffredini R, Borghi M, et al. Decompensation in direct-acting antiviral cured hepatitis C virus compensated patients with clinically significant portal hypertension: too rare to warrant universal Β-blocker therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2021;116:1342–1344.
7. Lesmana CRA, Raharjo M, Gani RA. Managing liver cirrhotic complications: overview of esophageal and gastric varices. Clin Mol Hepatol 2020;26:444–460.
8. Yoon KT, Liu H, Lee SS. β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: more friend than enemy. Clin Mol Hepatol 2021;27:425–436.
9. Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genescà J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Calleja JL, Aracil C, et al. β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2019;393:1597–1608.
10. Semmler G, Lens S, Meyer EL, Baiges A, Alvardo-Tapias E, Llop E, et al. Non-invasive tests for clinically significant portal hypertension after HCV cure. J Hepatol 2022;77:1573–1585.

Article information Continued