Prognostic implications of trunk muscle mass in liver cirrhosis

Article information

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018;24(3):297-298

Publication date (electronic) : 2018 September 10

doi : https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2018.0069

Jimin Han, Won Kim

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author : Won Kim Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 20 Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07061, Korea Tel: +82-2-870-2233, Fax: +82-2-831-2826 E-mail: drwon1@snu.ac.kr

Received 2018 August 9; Accepted 2018 August 16.

See Article on Page [Related article:] 319

In 1988, Rosenberg suggested that sarcopenia is the age-associated decline of lean body mass [1]. However, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Persons defined sarcopenia as a syndrome characterized by a progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass with either muscle weakness or poor physical performance, since the relationship between muscle strength and muscle mass is not linear [2]. Sarcopenia can be considered ‘primary’ when no other cause but ageing itself is evident, while sarcopenia can be considered ‘secondary’ when one or more other causes, such as inflammatory disease, malignancy, endocrine disease, and advanced organ failure, are evident [2].

The prevalence of sarcopenia among patients with liver cirrhosis was reported to be average 48.1% [3]. Sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis including higher risk of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. There are multiple factors which may contribute to sarcopenia in cirrhosis. The causes responsible for sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis include malnutrition, elevated myostatin level, abnormal use of protein as an energy source, activation of the inflammatory cytokines, and hormone deficiency [4].

There are various methods in clinical use for diagnosing low muscle mass. In the past, urine creatinine was used as an indicator of human muscle mass. Other diagnostic methods include anthropometric assessments, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and plethysmography. However, due to the recent advance of radiological examinations, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging have been mainly used to measure muscle mass for practical or investigational purpose [5].

In the current issue, Gu et al. evaluated the optimal cutoff values of psoas muscle thickness per height (PMTH) by gender for detecting sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients [6]. The skeletal muscle index (SMI), as assessed by the cross-sectional area of several muscles at the L3 vertebral level on CT, is one of the most widely used techniques. Moreover, PMTH was well correlated with SMI in their work. SMI-sarcopenia and sex-nonspecific cutoff of PMTH-sarcopenia were significantly associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis, but there was no significant association between sexspecific cutoffs of PMTH sarcopenia and mortality. The current work also adds to the growing body of literature investigating the prognostic role of sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Although there is a substantial limitation that PMTH cannot be measured at precise locations in patients with ascites or osteoporosis disease, the current study provides a simple and valuable criterion for measuring muscle mass with CT scan in patients with liver cirrhosis. In addition, more complete diagnostic criteria would be established if they further validate the diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia according to various etiologies of cirrhosis as well as gender of patients with liver cirrhosis.