| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Korean J Hepatol > Volume 17(2); 2011 > Article
Kim: Percutaneous interventional procedures in an era of liver transplantation
See Article on Page 106
Percutaneous needle biopsy1-4 under image guidance have been increasingly used in the diagnostic work-up of focal hepatic lesions. In addition, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT)5 and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)6 are useful in managing hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC).
A liver mass with an elevated serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) does not automatically indicate HCC. Moreover, AFP is an inadequate surveillance assay in high-risk groups. The diagnosis of HCC depends on radiological appearances and histologic examinations. In most cases, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate for the diagnosis of malignant liver cancers.4,7 Hence, they have led to a drastic decline in the requirement for liver biopsy of space-occupying lesions.8
The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) recommends needle biopsy of lesions ranging from 10 to 20 mm in diameter to patients with cirrhosis, since detection sensitivities of small malignant liver tumors (<2 cm) in cirrhotic liver are less than 13-67%.7,9 Furthermore, false positive results for HCC were reported as 7 % in liver transplantation (LT) recipients in the USA.10
The sensitivity of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) of liver lesions reported range from 67 to 100%, the specificity 80 to 100%,11 and the accuracy 91%.11,12 Image guided percutaneous needle biopsies are generally a safe and highly effective tool for diagnosing liver tumors. Major complication rates and associated mortality rates by liver biopsy are 0.05-0.18% and 0.006-0.031%, respectively. Major complication rates and mortality rates of PEIT and RFA are less than 2% and up to 0.1%, respectively.13,14
The biggest shortcoming of percutaneous biopsy is the potential risk of implantation of malignant cells into the needle tract. The incidence of needle tract implantation (NTI) of HCC has recently increased from 0.003-0.009% to 1-5%.2,15-18 The increased survival in patients with HCC may be one of the reasons for the high incidence reported in recent publications. Moreover, as the use of percutaneous interventional procedure becomes more popular, NTI of HCC is predicted to increase. In systematic review, the incidence of NTI following biopsy of HCC is 2.7% overall, or 0.9% per year.3 Although the use of ethanol was thought to prevent NTI after PEIT,19 the frequency of NTI is yet between 0.2-1.4%.20 Llovet et al21 reported a high rate (12.5%) of NTI after RFA, but later studies reported substantially lower rates.1,6 This discrepancy is thought to have occurred due to the small number of patients and percutaneous biopsy before RFA in this study.
The following risk factors affect the chances of NTI1; (1) the superficial or subcapsular location of the tumor,2 (2) more number of needle passes13,15 and the frequency of repositioning the needles (3) larger needle bore,16 (4) the use of an end-cutting needle,2,13,16 (5) the absence of or a too thin layer surrounding normal liver parenchyma along the needle tract,13,15 (6) high-grade (moderate or poor) differentiated HCC,2,13,20,21 (7) high serum AFP level,21 (8) tumor larger than 2 cm, (9) biopsy before RFA,21 and (10) patient with immunosuppression.19 Maturen et al22 suggested that a biopsy needle within an introducer could prevent needle tract seeding. In this method, the introducer stayed in place while multiple passes with the biopsy needle were made.22 Despite the usage of small caliber needles, PEIT may increase the risk of NTI compared to biopsy alone due to their multiple needle punctures and their stay in liver over an extended period.20 Therefore, larger volumes of ethanol during needle placement for PEIT may minimize the risk of NTI because of the sterilizing effect of alcohol along the needle tract and fewer needle punctures.19 Routine ablation of the needle tract during RFA and the use of an internally cooled electrode may also decrease the incidence of NTI.1,2,21 Patients with small or well-differentiated HCC are expected to have a longer life span than those with large or poorly differentiated HCC.15 Since the chance of detection of NTI is higher in the former,1,15,16 ablation should also be considered for both the lesion and the needle tract in cases of biopsy from a small liver nodule.
Helical CT is the preferred imaging technique to demonstrate NTI.2,15 The implanted tumors may show hyper-attenuation on the arterial phase. Thereafter, they show high to iso-attenuation on portal and equilibrium phase. The cause of the difference in the enhancement pattern between implanted tumors and HCC in the liver during the equilibrium phase is that the implanted tumor tissue is supplied only by the systemic arteries, unlike liver.2
NTI can be treated with local excision with clear margins and/or ablation, embolization, or local radiotherapy.15-17,19,20,22 Surgical resection offers the best chance to eradicate the implanted tumors, and the seeding did not adversely affect patient survival with the lesion being treated successfully by resection and local ablation.2,3,12,15-18,23
The size of the tumor implant and extrahepatic dissemination of the implanted tumor can be thought to affect the outcome after resection.23 However, the prognosis of HCC is usually dependent on liver function and the characteristics of intrahepatic lesions, not on the severity of metastatic lesions.24 Therefore NTI itself rarely affects patient survival.2,12,15-17,19,20,22
A study of Ahn et al25 reported that incidence of NTI after percutaneous biopsy or PEIT is similar to the previous study,26 and that percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) can also induce NTI. Several treatment modalities are recommended for NTI of HCC and their results are known to be acceptable. However, in this study, even though the prognosis of HCC is usually independent from the degree of metastasis, one fourth of the patients recurred after surgical excision and only method of excision for implanted nodules was significantly associated with recurrence. Thereby, when NTI is detected, en bloc wide excision of implanted tumor appears to be a preferable option.
Currently, LT has been proved to be an effective treatment option for HCC. Percutaneous procedure, including needle biopsy, PEIT or RFA in those patients would have a poor long term outcome of successful LT, because it turns a potentially curative lesion into an untreatable situation due to extrahepatic tumor dissemination along the needle track.23 Thus, some investigators emphasize that percutaneous interventional procedures are generally contraindicated and these procedures should be undertaken only in specialized liver transplant centers for selected cases of HCC.
In conclusion, although uncommon, NTI after needle biopsy for HCC can occur with an incident that is not negligible. In order to avoid NTI, percutaneous biopsy should only be considered in cases when imaging results are ambiguous, or pathologic confirmation is necessary before nonsurgical treatments, such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), PEIT, RFA, or chemotherapy.17,23 Since needle tract seeding may present after percutaneous interventional procedure and even after RFA, attention must be paid to the needle tract during extended follow-up.

References

1. Chang S, Kim SH, Lim HK, Kim SH, Lee WJ, Choi D, et al. Needle tract implantation after percutaneous interventional procedures in hepatocellular carcinomas: lessons learned from a 10-year experience. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:268-274. 18525230.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Chang S, Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Choi D, Lim JH. Needle tract implantation after sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of doubling time, frequency, and features on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:400-405. 16037512.
crossref pmid
3. Silva MA, Hegab B, Hyde C, Guo B, Buckels JA, Mirza DF. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2008;57:1592-1596. 18669577.
crossref pmid
4. Yeh CN, Chen MF, Jeng LB. Resection of peritoneal implantation from hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:863-868. 12417507.
crossref pmid
5. Almeida J, Mesquita M, Ferraz J, Yamanaka A, Escanhoela C, Boin IF, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma developing at the puncture site after percutaneous ethanol injection. J Clin Ultrasound 2008;36:105-107. 17960825.
crossref pmid
6. Chen MH, Yang W, Yan K, Hou YB, Dai Y, Gao W, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of problematically located hepatocellular carcinoma: tailored approach. Abdom Imaging 2008;33:428-436. 17639375.
crossref pmid
7. Hecht EM, Holland AE, Israel GM, Hahn WY, Kim DC, West AB, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MR imaging as a stand-alone sequence for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:438-447. 16641353.
crossref pmid
8. Lim JH, Cho JM, Kim EY, Park CK. Dysplastic nodules in liver cirrhosis: evaluation of hemodynamics with CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Radiology 2000;214:869-874. 10715060.
crossref pmid
9. Monzawa S, Ichikawa T, Nakajima H, Kitanaka Y, Omata K, Araki T. Dynamic CT for detecting small hepatocellular carcinoma: usefulness of delayed phase imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:147-153. 17179357.
crossref pmid
10. Hayashi PH, Trotter JF, Forman L, Kugelmas M, Steinberg T, Russ P, et al. Impact of pretransplant diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on cadveric liver allocation in the era of MELD. Liver Transpl 2004;10:42-48. 14755776.
crossref pmid
11. Guo Z, Kurtycz DF, Salem R, De Las Casas LE, Caya JG, Hoerl HD. Radiologically guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the liver: retrospective study of 119 cases evaluating diagnostic effectiveness and clinical complications. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:283-289. 11992368.
crossref pmid
12. Durand F, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A, Vilgrain V, Terris B, et al. Assessment of the benefits and risks of percutaneous biopsy before surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2001;35:254-258. 11580148.
crossref pmid
13. Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Radiology 1991;178:253-258. 1984314.
crossref pmid
14. Rhim H, Yoon KH, Lee JM, Cho Y, Cho JS, Kim SH, et al. Major complications after radio-frequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors: spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics 2003;23:123-134. 12533647.
crossref pmid
15. Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Cho JM, Jang HJ. Needle-tract implantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: frequency and CT findings after biopsy with a 19.5-gauge automated biopsy gun. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:246-250. 10823443.
crossref pmid
16. Huang GT, Sheu JC, Yang PM, Lee HS, Wang TH, Chen DS. Ultrasound-guided cutting biopsy for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma-a study based on 420 patients. J Hepatol 1996;25:334-338. 8895013.
crossref pmid
17. Takamori R, Wong LL, Dang C, Wong L. Needle-tract implantation from hepatocellular cancer: is needle biopsy of the liver always necessary? Liver Transpl 2000;6:67-72. 10648580.
crossref pmid
18. Shuto T, Yamamoto T, Tanaka S, Kanazawa A, Takemura S, Tanaka H, et al. Resection of needle-tract implantation after percutaneous puncture for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 2004;39:907-908. 15565415.
crossref pmid
19. Arrivé L, Vurgait A, Monnier-Cholley L, Lewin M, Balladur P, Poupon R, et al. Long-term follow-up after neoplastic seeding complicating percutaneous ethanol injection for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2002;12:74-76. 11868077.
crossref pmid
20. Ishii H, Okada S, Okusaka T, Yoshimori M, Nakasuka H, Shimada K, et al. Needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous ethanol injection. Cancer 1998;82:1638-1642. 9576282.
crossref pmid
21. Llovet JM, Vilana R, Brú C, Bianchi L, Salmeron JM, Boix L, et al. Increased risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2001;33:1124-1129. 11343240.
crossref pmid
22. Maturen KE, Nghiem HV, Marrero JA, Hussain HK, Higgins EG, Fox GA, et al. Lack of tumor seeding of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous needle biopsy using coaxial cutting needle technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1184-1187. 17056903.
crossref pmid
23. Liu YW, Chen CL, Chen YS, Wang CC, Wang SH, Lin CC. Needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma after fine needle biopsy. Dig Dis Sci 2007;52:228-231. 17151805.
crossref pmid
24. Yan P, Yan LN. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2003;2:491-495. 14627506.
pmid
25. Ahn DW, Shim JH, Yoon JH, Kim CY, Lee HS, Kim YT, et al. Treatment and clinical outcome of needle-track seeding from hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol 2011;17:106-112. 21757981.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Llovet JM, Mas X, Aponte JJ, Fuster J, Navasa M, Christensen E, et al. Cost effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma during the waiting list for liver transplantation. Gut 2002;50:123-128. 11772979.
crossref pmid pmc
Editorial Office
The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
Room A1210, 53 Mapo-daero(MapoTrapalace, Dowha-dong), Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04158, Korea
TEL: +82-2-703-0051   FAX: +82-2-703-0071    E-mail: kasl@kams.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver. All rights reserved.         
COUNTER
TODAY : 906
TOTAL : 67913