| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Korean J Hepatol > Volume 18(1); 2012 > Article
Jung, Park, Chon, Lee, Park, Lee, Seong, and Park: A case of isolated metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma arising from the pelvic bone

Abstract

Reports of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without a primary liver tumor are rare. Here we present a case of isolated HCC that had metastasized to the pelvic bone without a primary focus. A 73-year-old man presented with severe back and right-leg pain. Radiological examinations, including computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealed a huge mass on the pelvic bone (13×10 cm). He underwent an incisional biopsy, and the results of the subsequent histological examination were consistent with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. The tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3), hepatocyte paraffin 1, and glypican-3, and negative for CD56, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin on immunohistochemical staining. Examination of the liver by CT, MRI, positron-emission tomography scan, and angiography produced no evidence of a primary tumor. Radiotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization were performed on the pelvic bone, followed by systemic chemotherapy. These combination treatments resulted in tumor regression with necrotic changes. However, multiple lung metastases developed 1 year after the treatment, and the patient was treated with additional systemic chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and its incidence is increasing worldwide.1 As the treatment of HCC has remarkably improved, the survival of patients with HCC has been prolonged. Consequently, extrahepatic metastasis of HCC is now diagnosed more frequently and the incidence of bone metastasis from HCC is also increasing.2,3 However, cases of extrahepatic HCC without a detectable primary liver tumor have rarely been reported; in fact, bone metastasis from HCC, single or multiple, without the presence of a primary tumor has been reported in only six cases worldwide.4-9 Because of insufficient experience with these cases, diagnostic and treatment approaches for these patients are challenging. Here, we present a case of metastatic HCC arising from the pelvic bone without a primary focus.

CASE REPORT

A 73-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for evaluation of severe back pain and right leg pain for 1 month. The medical history of patient revealed that he was diagnosed as a hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier about 20 years earlier, but was lost to follow up. The patient was not a heavy drinker or smoker. There was no significant family history. On physical examination, a palpable and hard mass was noted in the right pelvic area. Hepatomegaly, liver masses, and ascites were absent. Initial laboratory findings were as follows: white blood cell count 4,830/µL, hemoglobin 15.2 g/dL, platelets 138,000/µL, total protein 7.8 g/dL, albumin 4.4 g/dL, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 31 IU/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 35 IU/L, total bilirubin 1.0 mg/dL, alkaline phosphate 98 IU/L, prothrombin time 14 second (INR 1.21), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 15.01 ng/mL, and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) 864 mAU/mL. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) were positive. Hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb), HBV-DNA with polymerase chain reaction, and serological markers of hepatitis C were negative. He belonged to Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A.
For evaluation of the pelvic mass, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed. They demonstrated a 13×10 cm expansile mass that involved the right iliac bone (Fig. 1). The patient underwent an incisional biopsy with the impression of a malignant bone tumor. However, on pathological examination, the tumor was composed of polygonal cells with ample cytoplasm and trabecular pattern. In immunohistochemical stains, these tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3), hepatocyte paraffin 1 (HepPar1), and glypican-3, which confirmed the diagnosis of HCC (Fig. 2). Tumor cells were negative for CD56, chromogranin A and synaptophysin, which are the markers of neuroendocrine differentiation. To find the primary focus, abdominal CT, MRI, positron emission tomography (PET) scans and angiography were performed. However, no tumor was found in the liver in these radiologic examinations.
We diagnosed this case as an isolated metastatic HCC of the pelvic bone without the presence of a primary cancer in the liver. Surgical resection of the tumor was recommended, but the patient refused an operation because of old age and the large size of the tumor. Instead, we decided to treat him with combined modalities. He started radiotherapy in the pelvic area with a total dose of 5,100 cGy in 17 fractions. One week after the end of radiotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed in the metastatic HCC of the pelvic bone via the right internal iliac artery (adriamycin 50 mg and 20 mL of lipiodol). Then, the patient was treated with five cycles of systemic chemotherapy based on 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU, 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (90 mg/m2 on day 2 every 4 weeks). After the completion of chemotherapy, the tumor became almost necrotic. The AFP and PIVKA-II levels decreased to the normal ranges (2.85 ng/mL and 28 mAU/mL, respectively). As the treatment resulted in near complete regression of the tumor, the patient underwent close follow-up without chemotherapy. However, 12 months after chemotherapy, a CT scan revealed multiple lung metastases in both lungs with increasing AFP and PIVKA-II levels (182 ng/mL and 38 mAU/mL, respectively). He was treated with two cycles of systemic chemotherapy with the same regimen (5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3 and cisplatin 90 mg/m2 on day 2). After two cycles of chemotherapy, the patient refused additional chemotherapy and we provided him with supportive care thereafter. Even though the lung metastases were newly developed, primary HCC had not been detected in the sequential radiological examinations, including abdominal CT and PET CT scans.

DISCUSSION

In this case, the final diagnosis was an isolated pelvic bone metastasis from HCC with unknown primary origin. Extrahepatic metastases from unknown primary HCC are exceptionally rare and only a few case reports of bone metastasis have been documented.4-9 The hypothesis for explaining this unusual phenomenon is that the metastases are from a microhepatocellular carcinoma, which regressed spontaneously or was destroyed by the activated immune system.6,7,10 However, the carcinogenesis mechanism as well as the natural history of this rare phenomenon is not well-known yet.7 Thus, the diagnostic approach and treatment have been performed on an individual basis.
Although the nature of tumor cell could be confirmed by histological examination including immunohistochemical stains, we had to make a differential diagnosis with hepatoid adenocarcinoma and HCC development from ectopic liver.11-13 Indeed, as there is no specific pathologic finding that could distinguish metastatic HCC from hepatoid adenocarcinoma or HCC arising from ectopic liver, information about involved organ, the presence of chronic liver disease and the degree of liver disease have been used as additional basis for differential diagnosis in previous studies.4-9 For example, reporting on a case of HCC in chest wall without unknown origin, Asselah et al4 made a final diagnosis of HCC arising in ectopic liver tissue, considering that the patient was not at high risk factors of HCC development and that the tumor developed in only parietal muscular tissue, which is an uncommon site for an HCC metastasis. In our case, we also had to make a diagnosis considering not only the pathological examination but also the clinical features of our case, even though we made a different diagnosis comparing from previous case. At first, in our case, neither hepatoid cells with large eosinophilic cytoplasm nor normal liver tissue was observed at microscopic histological examination, which could be shown in hepatoid adenocarcinoma or HCC arising from ectopic liver.9,14 Second, 1 year after treatment, new metastases developed in lung, which is the most common metastatic site of HCC.3,15 In previous studies, lung metastases from hepatoid adenocarcinoma or HCC arising from ectopic liver have rarely been reported.16,17 Moreover, to our knowledge, there is no report that hepatoid adenocarcinoma or ectopic liver developed from pelvic bone, even though they can originate from various organs.14,16,18 For these reasons, we made a final diagnosis of metastatic HCC with unknown primary HCC. However, we admit that our diagnosis may not be definitely confirmed in that histological was insufficient, as the specimen obtained from an incisional biopsy did not have non-cancerous tissue.
It can also be argued that a liver biopsy would be necessary for evaluating primary HCC in the liver. Coban et al19 reported a patient who presented an isolated extrahepatic HCC of the chest wall without a primary focus. The patient had HBV-related liver cirrhosis, and a diffusely nodular and heterogeneous echogenic pattern was shown in ultrasonography, but there was no evidence of HCC in the liver. However, a liver biopsy was performed, and histological examination confirmed a diffuse type of HCC. But, we thought that the benefit of a biopsy was uncertain in our case because the patient had no clinical evidence of liver cirrhosis, and the liver parenchyma was smooth without a mass or infiltrating lesion. Moreover, we performed CT, MRI, PET scans, and angiography to find primary HCC, but no evidence of a primary liver tumor was found. Finally, we thought that liver biopsy was unnecessary in our patient. However, even though a primary tumor was not found in our case, an intensive search for primary HCC should be carried out when extrahepatic metastasis is observed as the initial presentation.
Although there is no standard treatment for extrahepatic metastasis without a primary focus, aggressive treatment including surgical resection results in good prognosis if a solitary lesion exists.4,6,8,9 Iosca et al6 reported a case that presented with an isolated left iliac bone metastasis from a primary unknown HCC. The patient was treated with TACE followed by the surgical resection. He was alive without recurrence over 45 months. However, we could not perform surgical resection because our patient refused operation. Instead, we treated him with combined modalities including radiotherapy, TACE and systemic chemotherapy. Although chemotherapy and radiotherapy have not been demonstrated to increase the survival rate of HCC patients with bone metastasis, their ability to reduce pain and to increase quality of life has been reported in previous studies.15,20 In our case, back and leg pain were relieved after treatment. Moreover, TACE was performed without complications to the pelvic bone metastasis in our case. Indeed, TACE was successfully performed for bone metastasis of HCC in previous studies,6,21 and these results suggest that TACE could be considered as a treatment option for a bone metastasis from HCC. Even though multiple lung metastases developed, the tumor was well controlled for 12 months after the treatment. In conclusion, we think that individualized and multimodality treatment would be beneficial in such cases.
In summary, we reported a rare case of metastatic HCC of the pelvic bone without a known primary origin. In such cases, tissue biopsy and radiological examination should be performed and diagnosis should be made based on both pathological examination and clinical features. Individualized and combined modality treatment could be considered in such cases.

Abbreviations

AFP
alpha-feto-protein
ALT
alanine aminotransferase
AST
aspartate aminotransferase
CT
computed tomography
HBeAb
hepatitis B e antibody
HBeAg
hepatitis B e antigen
HBsAg
hepatitis B virus surface antigen
HBV
hepatitis B virus
HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
PET
positron emission tomography
PIVKA-II
protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II
TACE
transarterial chemoembolization
5-FU
5-Fluorouracil

References

1. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2003;362:1907-1917. 14667750.
crossref pmid
2. Natsuizaka M, Omura T, Akaike T, Kuwata Y, Yamazaki K, Sato T, et al. Clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:1781-1787. 16246200.
crossref pmid
3. Katyal S, Oliver JH 3rd, Peterson MS, Ferris JV, Carr BS, Baron RL. Extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2000;216:698-703. 10966697.
crossref pmid
4. Asselah T, Condat B, Cazals-Hatem D, Hassani Z, Bernuau J, Groussard O, et al. Ectopic hepatocellular carcinoma arising in the left chest wall: a long-term follow-up. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;13:873-875. 11474320.
crossref pmid
5. Hofmann HS, Spillner J, Hammer A, Diez C. A solitary chest wall metastasis from unknown primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:557-559. 12702916.
crossref pmid
6. Iosca A, Spaggiari L, Salcuni P. A bone hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis without hepatic tumor: a long-term follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:663. 9576474.
crossref
7. Qureshi SS, Shrikhande SV, Borges AM, Shukla PJ. Chest wall metastases from unknown primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:41-42. 15793338.
pmid
8. Raoul JL, Le Simple T, Le Prisé E, Meunier B, Ben Hassel M, Bretagne JF. Bone metastasis revealing hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of three cases with a long clinical course. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1162-1164. 7611219.
pmid
9. Hyun YS, Choi HS, Bae JH, Jun DW, Lee HL, Lee OY, et al. Chest wall metastasis from unknown primary site of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:2139-2142. 16610073.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Hong JH, Seo DD, Jeon TJ, Oh TH, Shin WC, Choi WC, et al. A case of spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases. Korean J Gastroenterol 2010;55:133-138. 20168060.
crossref pmid
11. Wang FH, Yip YC, Zhang M, Vong HT, Chan KI, Wai KC, et al. Diagnostic utility of glypican-3 for hepatocellular carcinoma on liver needle biopsy. J Clin Pathol 2010;63:599-603. 20501450.
crossref pmid
12. Van Wettere AJ, Degernes LA, Barnes HJ. Combined hepatocellularcholangiocarcinoma in a lesser flamingo (Phoenicopterus minor). Avian Pathol 2010;39:275-278. 20706883.
crossref pmid
13. Edgington TS. Antihepatocyte antibodies and hepatitis. Hepatology 1984;4:346-347. 6706308.
crossref pmid
14. Metzgeroth G, Ströbel P, Baumbusch T, Reiter A, Hastka J. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma-review of the literature illustrated by a rare case originating in the peritoneal cavity. Onkologie 2010;33:263-269. 20502062.
crossref pmid
15. Kim SU, Kim do Y, Park JY, Ahn SH, Nah HJ, Chon CY, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting with bone metastasis: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008;134:1377-1384. 18483745.
crossref pmid
16. Arakawa M, Kimura Y, Sakata K, Kubo Y, Fukushima T, Okuda K. Propensity of ectopic liver to hepatocarcinogenesis: case reports and a review of the literature. Hepatology 1999;29:57-61. 9862850.
crossref pmid
17. Wu Z, Upadhyaya M, Zhu H, Qiao Z, Chen K, Miao F. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma: computed tomographic imaging findings with histopathologic correlation in 6 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:846-852. 18043368.
crossref pmid
18. Caygill CP, Gatenby PA. Ectopic liver and hepatocarcinogenesis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;16:727-729. 15256972.
crossref pmid
19. Coban S, Yüksel O, Köklü S, Ceyhan K, Baykara M, Dökmeci A. Atypical presentation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a mass on the left thoracic wall. BMC Cancer 2004;4:89. 15574203.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Seong J, Koom WS, Park HC. Radiotherapy for painful bone metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2005;25:261-265. 15780048.
crossref pmid
21. Imamura H, Masutani S, Tatsuta M, Inoue Y, Makino S, Tsuda K, et al. A case report of successful transcatheter arterial embolization therapy for osseous metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2000;27:1941-1946. 11086450.
pmid
Figure 1
Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A 13×10-cm bone mass was found in the right iliac bone. (A, C, D: T1-weighted images, B: T2-weighted image).

kjhep-18-89-g001.jpg
Figure 2
Microscopic findings of the pelvic bone mass. The tumor was a hepatocellular carcinoma with a trabecular pattern (A: hematoxylin and eosin, ×200). The tumor cells were immunopositive for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) (B: ×200), hepatocyte paraffin 1 (C: ×200), and glypican-3 (D: ×200).

kjhep-18-89-g002.jpg
Editorial Office
The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
Room A1210, 53 Mapo-daero(MapoTrapalace, Dowha-dong), Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04158, Korea
TEL: +82-2-703-0051   FAX: +82-2-703-0071    E-mail: kasl@kams.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver. All rights reserved.         
COUNTER
TODAY : 338
TOTAL : 113847