CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
Sunyoung Lee, Seung-seob Kim, Dong ryul Chang, Hyerim Kim, Myeong-Jin Kim
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2020;26(3):340-351.   Published online 2020 June 4    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0004

Excel Download

Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology. 2020;26(3):340-351   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Diagnostic Performance of KLCA-NCC 2018 Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Diagnostics. 2021;11(10):1763   Crossref logo
Link1

Retrospective comparison of EASL 2018 and LI-RADS 2018 for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging
Hepatology International. 2019;14(1):70-79   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Computer-aided diagnosis program for classifying the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma on MR images following liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS)
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2017;47(3):710-722   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018
Korean Journal of Radiology. 2021;22(7):1066   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo: Implications for LI-RADS characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2016;34(7):915-921   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI‐RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2018;49(7):e205-e215   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4

Editorial for “Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI‐RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging”
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI‐RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Validation of the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center 2018 Criteria for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Journal of Liver Cancer. 2020;20(2):120-127   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Clin Mol Hepatol has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since March 1, 2015.