Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CMH : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

1
results for

"Complete virological response"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Complete virological response"

Original Article

Viral hepatitis

Efficacy of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients who exhibit suboptimal responses to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to resistance to nucleoside analogues (SATIS study)
Hye Won Lee, Jun Yong Park, Beom Kyung Kim, Moon Young Kim, Jung Il Lee, Young Suk Kim, Ki Tae Yoon, Kwang-Hyub Han, Sang Hoon Ahn
Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22(4):443-449.
Published online November 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2016.0037
Background/Aims
It remains to be determined whether switching from adefovir (ADV) to tenofovir (TDF) provides better virological outcomes in patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV plus nucleoside analogue (ADV+NA) therapy for NA-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
Methods
In this prospective trial, patients who showed partial responses (defined as serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA >60 IU/mL) to ADV+NA therapy for NA resistance were randomly allocated to receive TDF plus NA (TDF+NA group, n=16) or to continue their current therapy (ADV+NA group, n=16). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete virological response (CVR, defined as serum HBV DNA <60 IU/mL) at 48 weeks.
Results
The median age was 52 years (16 men), and 28 were positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The proportion with CVR was significantly higher in the TDF+NA group than in the ADV+NA group at 24 weeks (81.3% vs. 25.0%, P=0.001) and 48 weeks (87.5% vs. 37.5%, P=0.002). Furthermore, a decrease in the serum HBV DNA level of >2log10 IU/mL was more likely in the TDF+NA group at both 24 and 48 weeks (68.8% vs. 56.3%, P=0.014 vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%, P=0.001, respectively). During the follow-up, the rate of HBeAg seroconversion was higher in the TDF+NA group than the ADV+NA group (12.5% vs. 6.25%, P=0.640), as was that for the hepatitis B surface antigen (6.25% vs. 0%, P=0.080). No serious adverse events due to antiviral agents occurred.
Conclusions
In patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV+NA therapy for NA-resistant CHB, switching from ADV to TDF might provide better virological outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Comparative efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha monotherapy vs combination therapies with entecavir or tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients
    Huiqing Liang, Xiaoting Zheng, Qianguo Mao, Jiaen Yang, Qingfa Ruan, Chuncheng Wu, Yaoyu Liu, Siyan Chen, Luyun Zhang, Manying Zhang, Hongli Zhuang, Li Lin, Shaodong Chen, Hyun Jin Kwun
    Microbiology Spectrum.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of hepatic, hematological, and immunological markers and their temporal dynamics in chronic hepatitis B functional cure
    Jianyong Zeng, Caixia Zheng, Yincheng Zheng, Xiulan Xue, Benjamin M. Liu
    Microbiology Spectrum.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Entecavir versus tenofovir on the recurrence of hepatitis B–related HCC after liver transplantation: A multicenter observational study
    Deok-Gie Kim, YoungRok Choi, Jinsoo Rhu, Shin Hwang, Young Kyoung You, Dong-Sik Kim, Yang Won Nah, Bong-Wan Kim, Jai Young Cho, Koo Jeong Kang, Jae Do Yang, Donglak Choi, Dong Jin Joo, Myoung Soo Kim, Je Ho Ryu, Jae Geun Lee
    Liver Transplantation.2023; 29(12): 1272.     CrossRef
  • KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B

    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2022; 28(2): 276.     CrossRef
  • Is tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy still the optimal treatment for chronic hepatitis B patients with prior suboptimal response?
    Byoung Kuk Jang
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2020; 26(3): 312.     CrossRef
  • Long-term Efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Monotherapy for Multidrug-Resistant Chronic HBV infection
    Hye Won Lee, Jun Yong Park, Jin Woo Lee, Ki Tae Yoon, Chang Wook Kim, Hana Park, Young Seok Kim, Soon Ku Paik, Jung Il Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Kwang-Hyub Han, Sang Hoon Ahn
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 17(7): 1348.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the long-term efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B
    Dachuan Cai, Chen Pan, Weihua Yu, Shuangsuo Dang, Jia Li, Shanming Wu, Nan Jiang, Maorong Wang, Zhaohua Zhang, Feng Lin, Shaojie Xin, Yongfeng Yang, Baoshen Shen, Hong Ren
    Medicine.2019; 98(1): e13983.     CrossRef
  • Switching from tenofovir and nucleoside analogue therapy to tenofovir monotherapy in virologically suppressed chronic hepatitis B patients with antiviral resistance
    Dong Yun Kim, Hye Won Lee, Jeong Eun Song, Beom Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang‐Hyub Han, Jun Yong Park
    Journal of Medical Virology.2018; 90(3): 497.     CrossRef
  • Step-down Strategy in Antiviral Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Achieved Viral Suppression With Rescue Combination Therapy
    Dong Yun Kim, Jun Yong Park
    Future Virology.2018; 13(10): 711.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of three adefovir‐based combination therapies in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal response to adefovir monotherapy
    M.‐L. Wang, E.‐Q. Chen, D.‐M. Zhang, L.‐Y. Du, L.‐B. Yan, T.‐Y. Zhou, X.‐Z. Lei, B.‐J. Lei, J.‐J. Lu, J. Liao, H. Tang
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis.2017; 24(S1): 21.     CrossRef
  • 13,216 View
  • 161 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • Crossref