Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CMH : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

1
results for

"Oidov Baartarkhuu"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Oidov Baartarkhuu"

Original Article

Viral hepatitis

Antiviral efficacies of currently available rescue therapies for multidrug-resistant chronic hepatitis B
Mi Sung Park, Beom Kyung Kim, Kyung Sik Kim, Ja Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Oidov Baartarkhuu, Kwang Hyub Han, Chae Yoon Chon, Sang Hoon Ahn
Korean J Hepatol 2013;19(1):29-35.
Published online March 25, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2013.19.1.29
Background/Aims

The incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during sequential lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) treatment is increasing. We investigated the antiviral efficacies of various rescue regimens in patients who failed sequential LAM-ADV treatment.

Methods

Forty-eight patients (83.3% of whom were HBeAg-positive) who failed sequential LAM-ADV treatment were treated with one of the following regimens: entecavir (ETV) (1 mg) monotherapy (n=16), LAM+ADV combination therapy (n=20), or ETV (1 mg)+ADV combination therapy (n=12). All patients had confirmed genotypic resistance to both LAM and ADV and were evaluated every 12 weeks.

Results

The baseline characteristics and treatment duration did not differ significantly among the study groups. During the treatment period (median duration: 100 weeks), the decline of serum HBV DNA from baseline tended to be greatest in the ETV+ADV group at all-time points (week 48: -2.55 log10 IU/mL, week 96: -4.27 log10 IU/mL), but the difference was not statistically significant. The ETV+ADV group also tended to have higher virologic response rates at 96 weeks compared to the ETV monotherapy or LAM+ADV groups (40.0% vs. 20.0% or 20.0%, P=0.656), and less virologic breakthrough was observed compared to the ETV monotherapy or LAM+ADV groups (8.3% vs. 37.5% or 30.0%; P=0.219), but again, the differences were not statistically significant. HBeAg loss occurred in one patient in the ETV+ADV group, in two in the ETV monotherapy group, and in none of the LAM+ADV group. The safety profiles were similar in each arm.

Conclusions

There was a nonsignificant tendency toward better antiviral efficacy with ETV+ADV combination therapy compared to LAM+ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy for MDR CHB in Korea, where tenofovir is not yet available.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • ALT Is Not Associated With Achieving Subcirrhotic Liver Stiffness and HCC During Entecavir Therapy in HBV-Related Cirrhosis
    Mi Na Kim, Jae Seung Lee, Hye Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Se Young Jang, Won Young Tak, Young-Oh Kweon, Soo Young Park, Seung Up Kim
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 21(9): 2278.     CrossRef
  • Revised Korean Antiviral Guideline Reduces the Hepatitis B-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Cirrhotic Patients
    David Sooik Kim, Soo Young Park, Beom Kyung Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Kwang-Hyub Han, Yu Rim Lee, Won Young Tak, Young Oh Kweon, Inkyung Jung, Minkyung Han, Eun Hwa Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Seung Up Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Entecavir-based combination therapies for chronic hepatitis B
    Aoran Luo, Xiaoyan Jiang, Hong Ren
    Medicine.2018; 97(51): e13596.     CrossRef
  • Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between the Response-Guided Therapies and Monotherapies of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China
    Keng Lai, Chi Zhang, Weixia Ke, Yanhui Gao, Shudong Zhou, Li Liu, Yi Yang
    Clinical Drug Investigation.2017; 37(3): 233.     CrossRef
  • De novo entecavir+adefovir dipivoxil+lamivudine triple-resistance mutations resulting from sequential therapy with adefovir dipivoxil, and lamivudine
    Song Yang, Huichun Xing, Qi Wang, Xiaomei Wang, Shunai Liu, Jun Cheng
    Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy
    Jeong Han Kim, Sung Hyun Ahn, Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe, Kyun-Hwan Kim, So Young Kwon
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2016; 22(2): 241.     CrossRef
  • Lamivudine-resistant rtL180M and rtM204I/V are persistently dominant during combination rescue therapy with entecavir and adefovir for hepatitis B
    YANG WANG, SHUANG LIU, YU CHEN, SUJUN ZHENG, LI ZHOU, FENGMIN LU, ZHONGPING DUAN
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2016; 11(6): 2293.     CrossRef
  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in Korea: data from the clinical practice setting in a single-center cohort
    Sung Soo Ahn, Young Eun Chon, Beom Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang-Hyub Han, Jun Yong Park
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2014; 20(3): 261.     CrossRef
  • Oral antiviral agents for treatment of chronic hepatitis B
    Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2014; 57(1): 60.     CrossRef
  • Relevance of hepatitis B surface antigen levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B during 5 year of tenofovir treatment
    A. K. Singh, M. K. Sharma, S. S. Hissar, E. Gupta, S. K. Sarin
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis.2014; 21(6): 439.     CrossRef
  • Options for the management of antiviral resistance during hepatitis B therapy: reflections on battles over a decade
    Hyung Joon Yim, Seong Gyu Hwang
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2013; 19(3): 195.     CrossRef
  • 10,338 View
  • 63 Download
  • Crossref