Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CMH : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

8
results for

"Heejoon Jang"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Heejoon Jang"

Original Article

Outcomes of Oral Antidiabetic Drugs in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Nationwide Target Trial Emulation Study
Heejoon Jang, Yeonjin Kim, Yoo Kyoung Lim, Dong Hyeon Lee, Sae Kyung Joo, Bokyung Koo, Woojoo Lee, Stefano Romeo, Won Kim, Innovative Target Exploration of NAFLD (ITEN) consortium
Received September 5, 2025  Accepted December 30, 2025  Published online January 6, 2026  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2025.1006    [Accepted]
Background/Aims
Patients with concurrent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) face elevated cardiovascular risks. However, optimal oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) selection for this population remains unclear.
Methods
Using the Korean National Health Information Database, we conducted a target trial emulation comparing cardiovascular outcomes among patients with T2DM and MASLD (defined by fatty liver index ≥30) who initiated sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, or sulfonylureas with metformin. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke.
Results
Among 71,071 patients (331,726 person-years), SGLT2 inhibitor users experienced a significantly lower MACE risk compared to sulfonylurea users (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31–0.62). SGLT2 inhibitors also demonstrated a lower MACE risk compared to thiazolidinediones (aSHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39–0.96) and DPP-4 inhibitors (aSHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.96). Cardiovascular mortality risk was notably reduced with SGLT2 inhibitors compared to sulfonylureas (aSHR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.50), thiazolidinediones (aSHR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.86), and DPP-4 inhibitors (aSHR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.84). Mediation analysis revealed that MASLD regression accounted for 8.7% of the total cardiovascular benefit when comparing SGLT2 inhibitors to sulfonylureas.
Conclusions
In patients with concurrent T2DM and MASLD, SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated better cardiovascular outcomes compared to other OADs. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may be the preferred OAD choice for cardiovascular risk reduction in this high-risk population.
  • 671 View
  • 91 Download

Erratum

Erratum to ‘Evolutionary changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study’ [Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30:487-499]
Seogsong Jeong, Yun Hwan Oh, Joseph C Ahn, Seulggie Choi, Sun Jae Park, Hye Jun Kim, Gyeongsil Lee, Joung Sik Son, Heejoon Jang, Dong Hyeon Lee, Meng Sha, Lei Chen, Won Kim, Sang Min Park
Clin Mol Hepatol 2025;31(3):1105-1106.
Published online July 1, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0145e
Corrects: Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30(3):487
  • 7,665 View
  • 26 Download

Reply to Correspondence

Reply to correspondence on “Type 2 diabetes as a key metabolic risk factor for adverse outcomes in nucleos(t)ide analogue-treated chronic hepatitis B”
Heejoon Jang, Won Kim
Received May 14, 2025  Accepted June 4, 2025  Published online June 9, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2025.0533    [Accepted]
  • 2,231 View
  • 15 Download

Editorial

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Correspondence to editorial 2 on “Impacts of metabolic syndrome diseases on long-term outcomes of chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues”
    Rui Huang, Mindie H. Nguyen
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2026; 32(1): e85.     CrossRef
  • 2,713 View
  • 45 Download
  • Crossref

Original Articles

Viral hepatitis

Extrahepatic malignancies and antiviral drugs for chronic hepatitis B: A nationwide cohort study
Moon Haeng Hur, Dong Hyeon Lee, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Mi-Sook Kim, Jeayeon Park, Hyunjae Shin, Sung Won Chung, Hee Jin Cho, Min Kyung Park, Heejoon Jang, Yun Bin Lee, Su Jong Yu, Sang Hyub Lee, Yong Jin Jung, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon
Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30(3):500-514.
Published online May 10, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0055
Background/Aims
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is related to an increased risk of extrahepatic malignancy (EHM), and antiviral treatment is associated with an incidence of EHM comparable to controls. We compared the risks of EHM and intrahepatic malignancy (IHM) between entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment.
Methods
Using data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea, this nationwide cohort study included treatment-naïve CHB patients who initiated ETV (n=24,287) or TDF (n=29,199) therapy between 2012 and 2014. The primary outcome was the development of any primary EHM. Secondary outcomes included overall IHM development. E-value was calculated to assess the robustness of results to unmeasured confounders.
Results
The median follow-up duration was 5.9 years, and all baseline characteristics were well balanced after propensity score matching. EHM incidence rate differed significantly between within versus beyond 3 years in both groups (P<0.01, Davies test). During the first 3 years, EHM risk was comparable in the propensity score-matched cohort (5.88 versus 5.84/1,000 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]=1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.88–1.17, P=0.84). After year 3, however, TDF was associated with a significantly lower EHM incidence compared to ETV (4.92 versus 6.91/1,000 person-years; SHR=0.70, 95% CI=0.60–0.81, P<0.01; E-value for SHR=2.21). Regarding IHM, the superiority of TDF over ETV was maintained both within (17.58 versus 20.19/1,000 person-years; SHR=0.88, 95% CI=0.81–0.95, P<0.01) and after year 3 (11.45 versus 16.20/1,000 person-years; SHR=0.68, 95% CI=0.62–0.75, P<0.01; E-value for SHR=2.30).
Conclusions
TDF was associated with approximately 30% lower risks of both EHM and IHM than ETV in CHB patients after 3 years of antiviral therapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Chronic hepatitis B, extrahepatic malignancies and the use of antiviral drugs
    Meng-Che Wu, Shih-Chi Yang, Shuo-Yan Gau
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(1): e19.     CrossRef
  • The critical role of ferroptosis in virus-associated hematologic malignancies and its potential value in antiviral-antitumor therapy
    Miao Miao, Yuelei Chen, Xuehan Wang, Shengyang Li, Rong Hu
    Virulence.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Antiviral Therapy Reduces Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Hepatitis B: TDF as the Most Effective Agent
    Hyuk Kim, Jae‐Young Kim, Hyun Bin Choi, Ji‐Soo Lee, Yoon E. Shin, Jeong‐Ju Yoo, Sang Gyune Kim, Young‐Seok Kim
    Journal of Medical Virology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characteristics and outcomes in atorvastatin therapy for chronic subdural hematoma: a national, observational real-world study in China, 2019–2024
    Tao Liu, Zhihao Zhao, Jiao Wang, Xiaoying Chen, Jinhao Huang, Weiwei Jiang, Yunhu Yu, Xide Zhu, Kaijie Wang, Kun Lin, Hu Qin, Baixiang Peng, Guohe Zhang, Zhiyong Liu, Weiliang Chen, Jun Shen, Baozhi Chen, Shengjie Li, Mingqi Liu, Wanqiang Su, Wanhai Ding,
    The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific.2025; 63: 101688.     CrossRef
  • Association between atherogenic index of plasma and incident aortic disease: a population-based prospective analysis
    Cuihong Tian, Xiao Wang, Liang Tao, Wanyi Wei, Xuan Zhang, Haoxian Tang, Yequn Chen, Xuerui Tan
    Open Heart.2025; 12(2): e003511.     CrossRef
  • Nucleos(t)ide analog therapy of chronic hepatitis B and extrahepatic cancer risk: Is tenofovir better than entecavir?: Editorial on “Extrahepatic malignancies and antiviral drugs for chronic hepatitis B: A nationwide cohort study”
    Yewan Park, Dong Hyun Sinn
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2024; 30(4): 718.     CrossRef
  • Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on liver function in patients with hepatitis B
    Tong Sun, Hongbo Chi, Jing Wang, Yufen Zheng, Hongguo Zhu, Jingxian Zhao, Kai Zhou, Mengyuan Chen, Donglian Wang, Tao-Hsin Tung, Jiaqin Xu, Bo Shen
    BMC Infectious Diseases.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,578 View
  • 224 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Steatotic liver disease

Evolutionary changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study
Seogsong Jeong, Yun Hwan Oh, Joseph C Ahn, Seulggie Choi, Sun Jae Park, Hye Jun Kim, Gyeongsil Lee, Joung Sik Son, Heejoon Jang, Dong Hyeon Lee, Meng Sha, Lei Chen, Won Kim, Sang Min Park
Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30(3):487-499.
Published online May 7, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0145
Background/Aims
To determine the association between evolutionary changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) status and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a nationwide population-based cohort.
Methods
Information on study participants was derived from the Korea National Health Insurance Service database. The study population consisted of 5,080,410 participants who underwent two consecutive biennial health screenings between 2009 and 2012. All participants were followed up until HCC, death, or 31 December 2020. The association of evolutionary changes in MASLD status, as assessed by the fatty liver index and cardiometabolic risk factors, including persistent non-MASLD, resolved MASLD, incident MASLD, and persistent MASLD, with HCC risk was evaluated using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results
Among the 5,080,410 participants with 39,910,331 person-years of follow-up, 4,801 participants developed HCC. The incidence of HCC in participants with resolved, incident, and persistent MASLD was approximately 2.2-, 2.3-, and 4.7-fold higher, respectively, than that in those with persistent non-MASLD among the Korean adult population. When stratifying the participants according to the evolutionary change in MASLD status, persistent (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68–3.21; P<0.001), incident (aHR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.63–2.10; P<0.001), and resolved MASLD (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.18–1.50; P<0.001) had an increased risk of HCC compared to persistent non-MASLD.
Conclusions
The evolutionary changes in MASLD were associated with the differential risk of HCC independent of metabolic risk factors and concomitant medications, providing additional information on the risk of HCC stratification in patients with MASLD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Dietary quality, perceived health, and psychological status as key risk factors for newly developed metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease in a longitudinal study
    Xuangao Wu, Ting Zhang, Sunmin Park
    Nutrition.2025; 130: 112604.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Point-of-Care Prediction Model for Steatotic Liver Disease: Expected Role of Mass Screening in the Global Obesity Crisis
    Jeayeon Park, Goh Eun Chung, Yoosoo Chang, So Eun Kim, Won Sohn, Seungho Ryu, Yunmi Ko, Youngsu Park, Moon Haeng Hur, Yun Bin Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Yoon Jun Kim
    Gut and Liver.2025; 19(1): 126.     CrossRef
  • Cigarette Smoke Contributes to the Progression of MASLD: From the Molecular Mechanisms to Therapy
    Jiatong Xu, Yifan Li, Zixuan Feng, Hongping Chen
    Cells.2025; 14(3): 221.     CrossRef
  • KASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease 2025
    Won Sohn, Young-Sun Lee, Soon Sun Kim, Jung Hee Kim, Young-Joo Jin, Gi-Ae Kim, Pil Soo Sung, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Young Chang, Eun Joo Lee, Hye Won Lee, Miyoung Choi, Su Jong Yu, Young Kul Jung, Byoung Kuk Jang
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(Suppl): S1.     CrossRef
  • Revealing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to reducing the global burden of SLD through the COVID-19 pandemic: Editorial on “Current burden of steatotic liver disease and fibrosis among adults in the United States, 2017–2023”
    Jeayeon Park, Su Jong Yu
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(2): 625.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the editor on “Evolutionary changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”
    Hai Xu, Yong Zhou, Huikun Wu
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(2): e125.     CrossRef
  • Correspondence to letter to the editor 2 on “Evolutionary changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”
    Seogsong Jeong, Won Kim, Sang Min Park
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(2): e210.     CrossRef
  • Correspondence to editorial on “Adverse impact of metabolic dysfunction on fibrosis regression following direct-acting antiviral therapy: A multicenter study for chronic hepatitis C”
    Tom Ryu, Young Chang, Seung Up Kim, Jae Young Jang
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(2): e203.     CrossRef
  • Correspondence to letter to the editor 1 on “Evolutionary changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study”
    Seogsong Jeong, Won Kim, Sang Min Park
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(2): e208.     CrossRef
  • MAFLD or MASLD: Which better represents the prognosis of the steatotic liver population: Letter to the editor on “Evolutionary changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide cohort st
    Ying Wang, Shengfeng Wang, Xiude Fan, Jiajun Zhao, Yongfeng Song
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(2): e128.     CrossRef
  • Significant hepatic fat loss after metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Beware of misclassification as absence of disease
    Seogsong Jeong
    Journal of Hepatology.2025; 83(3): e156.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in the Korean General Population: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Non-Invasive Screening
    Yong Jun Choi, Jooheon Park, Han-Ik Cho, Myung Geun Shin, Eun-Hee Nah
    Metabolites.2025; 15(5): 299.     CrossRef
  • Protective effects of Ginkgo biloba supplementation on clinical outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
    Tom Ryu, Beom Sun Chung, Jaejun Lee, Ji Won Han, Hyun Yang, Keungmo Yang
    Phytomedicine.2025; 143: 156889.     CrossRef
  • Proteomic variation underlies the heterogeneous risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease for subsequent chronic diseases
    Jialong Wu, Gonghua Wu, Jiawei Li, Bo Yi, Qingyi Jia, Ke Ju, Qingyang Shi, Zixuan Wang, Xiong Xiao, Bing Guo, Huan Xu, Xing Zhao
    European Journal of Endocrinology.2025; 192(5): 691.     CrossRef
  • Association between green space and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a retrospective cohort study of seven South Korean metropolitan areas
    Dong Hyun Kim, Seulggie Choi, Seogsong Jeong, Jooyoung Chang, Sung Min Kim, Sun Jae Park, Jun Hwan Kim, Joung Sik Son, Gyeongsil Lee, Soo Jung Choi, Yun Hwan Oh, Kyae Hyung Kim, Sang Min Park
    International Journal of Environmental Health Research.2025; 35(12): 4026.     CrossRef
  • Early portal hypertension in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a concise review
    Iván López-Méndez, Eva Juárez-Hernández, Juan Pablo Soriano-Márquez, Misael Uribe, Graciela Castro-Narro
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2025; 19(7): 755.     CrossRef
  • Identification of potentially effective drugs for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease against liver cirrhosis: In-silico drug repositioning-based retrospective cohort study
    Chae Won Lee, Eun Seok Kang, Seogsong Jeong, Hyun Wook Han, Samuel O. Antwi
    PLOS One.2025; 20(6): e0323880.     CrossRef
  • All-cause and disease-specific mortality in young adults with MASLD: A nationwide cohort study
    Jeayeon Park, Goh Eun Chung, Su Jong Yu, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Kyungdo Han, Eun Ju Cho
    JHEP Reports.2025; 7(9): 101477.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis
    Ryan Yanzhe Lim, Faith Xin Ning Tan, Glenn Jun Kit Ho, Ethan Kai Jun Tham, Alfred Kow, Guoyue Lv, Zhong-Qi Fan, Nicholas Syn, Masahito Nakano, Wenhao Li, Karn Wijarnpreecha, Jörn M. Schattenberg, Vincent Chen, Ming-Hua Zheng, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Hirok
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Even Lower Alcohol Intake Might Be Harmful for East Asian Males With MASLD Spectrum
    Byungyoon Yun, Juyeon Oh, Heejoo Park, Jian Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Jin-Ha Yoon
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From mechanisms to management: Early detection and improved treatment of MASLD and its related hepatocellular carcinoma
    Dingwu Li, Xiang Zhang
    Hepatology Communications.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 11,936 View
  • 345 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Editorial

Steatotic liver disease

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Genetic and Metabolic Characteristics of Lean Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in a Korean Health Examinee Cohort
    Huiyul Park, Eileen L. Yoon, Goh Eun Chung, Eun Kyung Choe, Jung Ho Bae, Seung Ho Choi, Mimi Kim, Woochang Hwang, Hye-Lin Kim, Sun Young Yang, Dae Won Jun
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(2): 316.     CrossRef
  • Dietary inflammatory impact on NAFLD development in obese vs. lean individuals: an analysis based on NHANES 2003–2018
    Lurao Li, Xiawen Shu, Yun Yi, Chun Wang, Jianghui Li, Yang Ding, Jin Li, Ying Chang
    Lipids in Health and Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Obesity and risk for liver disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study
    Wen An, Jing Luo, Zhe Yu, Mengqi Li, Herui Wei, Aqian Song, Yuanpeng Mao, Hao Bian, Lingling He, Fan Xiao, Hongshan Wei
    British Journal of Nutrition.2024; 132(10): 1403.     CrossRef
  • Epigenetic Regulation in Lean Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
    Ioanna Aggeletopoulou, Maria Kalafateli, Efthymios P. Tsounis, Christos Triantos
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(16): 12864.     CrossRef
  • 8,059 View
  • 108 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • Crossref
Original Article

Hepatic neoplasm

Effectiveness of nivolumab versus regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who failed sorafenib treatment
Cheol-Hyung Lee, Yun Bin Lee, Minseok Albert Kim, Heejoon Jang, Hyunwoo Oh, Sun Woong Kim, Eun Ju Cho, Kyung-Hun Lee, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Tae-You Kim, Yoon Jun Kim
Clin Mol Hepatol 2020;26(3):328-339.
Published online May 28, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2019.0049n
Background/Aims
Several treatment options are currently available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) failing previous sorafenib treatment. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of regorafenib and nivolumab in these patients.
Methods
Consecutive HCC patients who received regorafenib or nivolumab after failure of sorafenib treatment were included. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were time to progression, tumor response rate, and adverse events. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score was conducted to reduce treatment selection bias.
Results
Among 150 study patients, 102 patients received regorafenib and 48 patients received nivolumab. Median OS was 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0–10.8) months for regorafenib and 5.9 (95% CI, 3.7–8.1) months for nivolumab (P=0.77 by log-rank test). In multivariable analysis, nivolumab was associated with prolonged OS (vs. regorafenib: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30–0.96; P=0.04). Time to progression was not significantly different between groups (nivolumab vs. regorafenib: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51–1.30; P=0.48). HRs were maintained after IPTW.
Objective
response rates were 5.9% and 16.7% in patients treated with regorafenib and nivolumab, respectively (P=0.04).
Conclusions
After sorafenib failure, the use of nivolumab may be associated with improved OS and better
objective
response rate as compared to using regorafenib.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Effectiveness of regorafenib in second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yunzhi Shen, Yu Bai
    Medicine.2025; 104(4): e41356.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Muhammad A.B. Naeem, Muhammad R. Paracha, Ahmad Noor, Muhammad H.A. Khalid, Hafiza K. Shahid, Maaz Khan, Moeaza R. Rizvi, Javeeria Arshad, Talha Abbas, Azeem Saeed, Hamza Ashraf, Minahil Ali, Mishal Asif, Aanusha Ghouri
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of post‐progression survival in second‐line treatment with molecular target agents for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kazuto Tajiri, Nozomu Muraishi, Aiko Murayama, Yuka Hayashi, Ichiro Yasuda
    Hepatology Research.2024; 54(4): 403.     CrossRef
  • Approved immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ruyi Zhang, Fang Wang, Zhiyu You, Dongyang Deng, Jiangyan He, Wentao Yan, Jian Quan, Jing Wang, Shujuan Yan
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Nivolumab and Regorafenib as Second-line Systemic Therapies after Sorafenib Failure in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hong Jun Lee, Jae Seung Lee, Hyesung So, Ja Kyung Yoon, Jin-Young Choi, Hye Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Jun Yong Park, Sang Hoon Ahn, Do Young Kim
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2024; 65(7): 371.     CrossRef
  • Nivolumab as Second-Line Therapy Improves Survival in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Faisal M. Sanai, Hassan O. Odah, Kanan Alshammari, Adnan Alzanbagi, Murooj Alsubhi, Hani Tamim, Ashwaq Alolayan, Ahmed Alshehri, Saleh A. Alqahtani
    Cancers.2024; 16(12): 2196.     CrossRef
  • The interdisciplinary approach to investigate bona fide agent(s) in flavonoids or alkaloids in treating HCC
    Ki-Kwang Oh, Sang-Jun Yoon, Seol Hee Song, Jeong Ha Park, Jeong Su Kim, Min Ju Kim, Goo-Hyun Kwon, Dong Joon Kim, Ki-Tae Suk
    Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology.2024; 52(1): 500.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yuwei Liu, Jiahui Pan, Fangbo Gao, Wentao Xu, Hongyu Li, Xingshun Qi
    Advances in Therapy.2023; 40(2): 521.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating liver function and the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systemic review and meta-analysis
    Bao-Wen Tian, Lun-Jie Yan, Zi-Niu Ding, Hui Liu, Cheng-Long Han, Guang-Xiao Meng, Jun-Shuai Xue, Zhao-Ru Dong, Yu-Chuan Yan, Jian-Guo Hong, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Dong-Xu Wang, Tao Li
    International Immunopharmacology.2023; 114: 109519.     CrossRef
  • Sorafenib versus nivolumab after lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yuna Kim, Jae Seung Lee, Hye Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Myung Ji Goh, Wonseok Kang, Seung Up Kim
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 35(2): 191.     CrossRef
  • Immunotherapy and the Combination with Targeted Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Carmelo Laface, Girolamo Ranieri, Felicia Maria Maselli, Francesca Ambrogio, Caterina Foti, Michele Ammendola, Marigia Laterza, Gerardo Cazzato, Riccardo Memeo, Giovanni Mastrandrea, Marco Lioce, Palma Fedele
    Cancers.2023; 15(3): 654.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors of nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ding XIONG, Kui ZHANG, Mingqing XU
    Panminerva Medica.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Updates and Outlook
    Yinjie Fan, Hang Xue, Huachuan Zheng
    Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2022; Volume 9: 233.     CrossRef
  • Intrahepatic inflammatory IgA+PD-L1high monocytes in hepatocellular carcinoma development and immunotherapy
    Pil Soo Sung, Dong Jun Park, Pu Reun Roh, Kyoung Do Mun, Sung Woo Cho, Gil Won Lee, Eun Sun Jung, Sung Hak Lee, Jeong Won Jang, Si Hyun Bae, Jong Young Choi, Jonghwan Choi, Jaegyoon Ahn, Seung Kew Yoon
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.2022; 10(5): e003618.     CrossRef
  • Durable objective response to sorafenib and role of sequential treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kuo-Wei Huang, Pei-Chang Lee, Yee Chao, Chien-Wei Su, I-Cheng Lee, Keng-Hsin Lan, Chi-Jen Chu, Yi-Ping Hung, San-Chi Chen, Ming-Chih Hou, Yi-Hsiang Huang
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2022; 28(4): 583.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Korean Journal of Radiology.2022; 23(12): 1126.     CrossRef
  • Blood-based biomarkers for immune-based therapy in advanced HCC: Promising but a long way to go
    Pil Soo Sung, Isaac Kise Lee, Pu Reun Roh, Min Woo Kang, Jaegyoon Ahn, Seung Kew Yoon
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Real-world systemic sequential therapy with sorafenib and regorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study in Korea
    Min Jin Lee, Sung Won Chang, Ji Hoon Kim, Young-Sun Lee, Sung Bum Cho, Yeon Seok Seo, Hyung Joon Yim, Sang Youn Hwang, Hyun Woong Lee, Young Chang, Jae Young Jang
    Investigational New Drugs.2021; 39(1): 260.     CrossRef
  • Targeted treatment of alcoholic liver disease based on inflammatory signalling pathways
    Bingjian Wen, Chengcheng Zhang, Jingwen Zhou, Zhengyan Zhang, Qishi Che, Hua Cao, Yan Bai, Jiao Guo, Zhengquan Su
    Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 222: 107752.     CrossRef
  • Surgery versus external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma involving the inferior vena cava or right atrium: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Han Ah Lee, Sunmin Park, Yeon Seok Seo, Won Sup Yoon, In‐Soo Shin, Chai Hong Rim
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2021; 28(12): 1031.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death-1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shukang He, Weichao Jiang, Kai Fan, Xiaobei Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment efficacy by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy vs. sorafenib after liver-directed concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sojung Han, Hye Jin Choi, Seung-Hoon Beom, Hye Rim Kim, Hyein Lee, Jae Seung Lee, Hye Won Lee, Jun Yong Park, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang-Hyub Han, Jinsil Seong, Jong Yun Won, Beom Kyung Kim
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2021; 147(10): 3123.     CrossRef
  • Evolving therapeutic strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Ammar Qureshi, Miguel Michel, Jaren Lerner, Constantin A. Dasanu
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.2021; 22(18): 2495.     CrossRef
  • Metformin and Dichloroacetate Suppress Proliferation of Liver Cancer Cells by Inhibiting mTOR Complex 1
    Tae Suk Kim, Minjong Lee, Minji Park, Sae Yun Kim, Min Suk Shim, Chea Yeon Lee, Dae Hee Choi, Yuri Cho
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(18): 10027.     CrossRef
  • Nivolumab Versus Regorafenib in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Sorafenib Failure
    Yuan-Hung Kuo, Yi-Hao Yen, Yen-Yang Chen, Kwong-Ming Kee, Chao-Hung Hung, Sheng-Nan Lu, Tsung-Hui Hu, Chien-Hung Chen, Jing-Houng Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Knockdown of Atg7 suppresses Tumorigenesis in a murine model of liver cancer
    Kyung Joo Cho, Sun Yeong Shin, Hyuk Moon, Beom Kyung Kim, Simon Weonsang Ro
    Translational Oncology.2021; 14(9): 101158.     CrossRef
  • Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: consideration for selecting second-line treatment
    Bo Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2021; 21(2): 124.     CrossRef
  • Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review
    Kyoko Oura, Asahiro Morishita, Joji Tani, Tsutomu Masaki
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(11): 5801.     CrossRef
  • Potential predictors for survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis
    Huilin Xu, Dedong Cao, Yongfa Zheng, Dingjie Zhou, Xin Chen, Jinju Lei, Wei Ge, Ximing Xu
    International Immunopharmacology.2021; 100: 108135.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Analysis of Lenvatinib and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Center, Propensity Score Study
    Jaejun Lee, Ji-Won Han, Pil-Soo Sung, Soon-Kyu Lee, Hyun Yang, Hee-Chul Nam, Sun-Hong Yoo, Hae-Lim Lee, Hee-Yeon Kim, Sung-Won Lee, Jung-Hyun Kwon, Jeong-Won Jang, Chang-Wook Kim, Soon-Woo Nam, Jung-Suk Oh, Ho-Jong Chun, Si-Hyun Bae, Jong-Young Choi, Seun
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(18): 4045.     CrossRef
  • Optimal sequence of systemic therapy after sorafenib failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sojung Han, Do Young Kim
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2020; 26(3): 305.     CrossRef
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz, Antonio Facciorusso, Tarek Nayfeh, Samer Saadi, Mohamed Elnaggar, Christian Cotsoglou, Rodolfo Sacco
    Vaccines.2020; 8(4): 616.     CrossRef
  • Nivolumab/regorafenib

    Reactions Weekly.2020; 1830(1): 253.     CrossRef
  • 12,990 View
  • 358 Download
  • 36 Web of Science
  • Crossref